| | Following the concern expressed by a number of commentators about the electoral advantage being given to the BNP due to the ongoing scandal surrounding MPs’ expenses claims, there is another fringe group that seeks to capitalise on the widespread disgust and disappointment at the conduct of our elected representatives in the main political parties.
|
The recent disclosures over MPs’ claims for expenses has led Hizb ut-Tahrir, the fringe activist group that advocates rejection of democracy and democratic participation by Muslim citizens, to issue a leaflet urging Muslims to take note of the recent scandals and see them not as aberrations that need correction by introducing reforms, but as the inevitable results of ‘man made systems’ of governance.
For HT, these crises, and many others, are the products of a system that is not anchored in a moral universe that would otherwise govern its practices and check against descent into greed and unethical conduct. Such can only come about when Muslims reject these ‘man made systems’ and embrace the Caliphate.
The latest leaflet by the organisation states:
‘The economic crisis and collapse of the financial system, Britain’s broken society, wider social breakdown, and human rights abuses committed as part of the war on terror are also symptoms of this ideological decay – they are all linked to the values of capitalism: excess, greed, individualism and materialism.
‘If once naive people saw some benefit in it they must now realise that it is not only fundamentally defective but it corrupts those who work within the system. We must abandon calls to participate in this political system.’
The problem with statements such as this, that throw the baby out with the bathwater, is that they overlook the important aspect of individual and national responsibility in contributing to and maintaining the kinds of standards and ethics we want to see shape our public life and those engaged in it.
HT’s calls for rejecting the democratic system have always been premised on a romanticised view of Islam’s history and the naïve belief that a benign philosopher king is the natural product of an Islamic political community. HT forgets, or ignores, lessons from Islam’s own encounter with avaricious, self serving rulers. The fault lies not, as they like to claim, with the system, but with those who fail themselves and their electorate by engaging in unethical practices that shame the trust we place in them and our public culture.
At a time when Europeans are showing little interest in the upcoming European elections, and the BNP stands to gain from voter disgust with Labour and Conservative politicians, urging Muslims to abandon their civic responsibilities, is itself an act of gross misconduct.
The lessons Muslims should draw from the MPs scandal is that political communities are human, at times all too human, communities. And if we seek a public culture and political society that values transparency, integrity and accountability, then we all share a responsibility to be part of the debate that shapes those standards and enforces them through investigative journalism and institutional oversight.
The answer is not to reject democratic participation, but to embrace it wholeheartedly with a view to ever improving our politics and political culture.
|