|
Tuesday, 14 April 2009 09:04 |
The problem with Hargey’s claims that he is singled out and persecuted by ‘Muslim McCarthyists’ because he seeks to fashion a reformed Islam more at home in its British setting is that he wishes for himself what he will deny others. While championing his right to engage in 'free thinking', he decries the thinking of other Muslims that don’t share his vision of what a ‘British Islam’ looks like.
The problem is all too characteristic of the travails of being a British Muslim with ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’ and ‘enlightened’ Muslims all looking to exclude others as they unilaterally shape the contours of the fashionably new liberal theology that will define the 21st century British Muslim. But this liberal theology is often liberal only in name, as Hargey’s stance on the wearing of face veils makes clear.
Were Hargey sincere in his endeavour to empower Muslims to align themselves with imams of a progressive tradition without fear of being maligned, he would realise that most Muslims are not enamoured of his thinking, not because they fear the so-called McCarthyite majority, but because the thinking Muslim majority simply don’t find his sermons or ideas convincing. This Ummah Pulse piece on the 'Friday prayer' organised by Hargey, and led by Amina Wadud, is instructive of this. It was notable that more journalists attended Hargey's rather obvious publicity stunt than actual Muslims.
Of course, neither the Independent nor The Times makes any mention of this. But then, where’s the story in a fringe figure like Hargey winning a libel case against a newspaper that ill researched an article before putting it into print?
|