Wednesday, April 23 2014

New IPPR report: 'Madrassas in the British media'



 The Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) has published a report titled “Madrassas in the British Media”, which presents preliminary findings of an extensive analysis of “the way that madrassas have been portrayed by national and local media over the past decade.”

Some of the findings of the report are presented below, and you can read the full report here.

The report states:

“The strongly negative headlines generated by events such as 9/11 and 7/7 have changed the way that Muslims and Islam are discussed in the press. Madrassas (particularly those in countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan) are now frequently mentioned in the context of debates about radicalisation and extremism, and it is likely that this has had an important impact on the way that they are perceived by policymakers and in communities in Britain.”

“Our analysis reveals that some newspapers have been particularly active in covering news around madrassas. Nationally, The Times, Guardian, Daily Mail and Telegraph have included more articles referring to madrassas in the UK than other news sources. Locally, there have been greater levels of coverage in the Yorkshire Post, the Bradford-based Telegraph and Argus and the London-based Evening Standard.”

“...the number of articles on madrassas has increased since 2002, with 11 times more articles being found in 2010 than in 2002.”

Both the headlines and the topic/narrative of each of the articles were analysed for the report to see the degree to which they painted either a positive or negative view of madrassas in the UK. The findings highlight a divide between national and local media coverage:

“An initial comparison of headlines immediately reveals a national versus local divide. Local newspapers have equal proportions of negative and objective headlines (32 per cent), and a slightly higher proportion of positive headlines (37 per cent). However, national headlines are significantly more likely to be negative (54 per cent) than objective (27 per cent) or positive (19 per cent). This divergence might be explained by the fact that headlines are associated with sales and so national newspapers (with their higher daily circulation levels) are more likely to seek to make a profit with an attention-grabbing headline than with an objective one.”

“The data indicates that the majority of stories about madrassas in national newspapers have been negative (and are more likely to use inflammatory language and biased representations), while local papers have been more objective.”

“This tendency towards negative coverage is arguably a result of what newspapers consider to be newsworthy. With thousands of active madrassas in the UK, newspapers are more likely to pick up on examples of bad practice and report them in a way that generates greater interest in the story.”

“The most consistently negative national newspaper is seen to be the Daily Mail, with 88 per cent of its coverage of madrassas being framed in a negative way.”

When articles are broken down according to their dominant storyline, the findings show that national articles are dominant in coverage around the “role and influence of madrassas in relation to extremist activities. Local coverage on the other hand is more focused on the positive role that these institutions might play in preventing extremism by, for instance, teaching pupils about the real values of Islam instead of leaving that role to more radical groups capable of exploiting young people’s ignorance.”

When analysing the spokespeople used by both national and local media in their articles, the report finds an “absence of members of the community and madrassa representatives themselves, particularly in national articles, potentially perpetuating a view of madrassas that may not be the reality for those engaging directly with them or working within them.”

“National articles cited reports and spokespeople from think-tanks or charities far more frequently than local articles. In contrast, local articles were the only ones that published comments from police representatives and more commonly represented the views of madrassa staff. Local articles also used Muslim representatives to a greater degree than national articles, perhaps revealing a more balanced approach to the selection of commentators.”


The final report of the study will be published in September 2011.








Last Updated on Monday, 28 February 2011 13:49

Comments

 
0 #3 State Funded Muslim SchoolsIftikhar Ahmad 2011-11-27 17:02
Bilingual Muslims children have a right, as much as any other faith group, to be taught their culture, languages and faith alongside a mainstream curriculum. More faith schools will be opened under sweeping reforms of the education system in England. There is a dire need for the growth of state funded Muslim schools to meet the growing needs and demands of the Muslim parents and children. Now the time has come that parents and community should take over the running of their local schools. Parent-run schools will give the diversity, the choice and the competition that the wealthy have in the private sector. Parents can perform a better job than the Local Authority because parents have a genuine vested interest. The Local Authority simply cannot be trusted.

The British Government is planning to make it easier to schools to “opt out” from the Local Authorities. Muslim children in state schools feel isolated and confused about who they are. This can cause dissatisfaction and lead them into criminality, and the lack of a true understanding of Islam can ultimately make them more susceptible to the teachings of fundamentalists like Christians during the middle ages and Jews in recent times in Palestine. Fundamentalism is nothing to do with Islam and Muslim; you are either a Muslim or a non-Muslim.

There are hundreds of state primary and secondary schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion all such schools may be opted out to become Muslim Academies. This mean the Muslim children will get a decent education. Muslim schools turned out balanced citizens, more tolerant of others and less likely to succumb to criminality or extremism. Muslim schools give young people confidence in who they are and an understanding of Islam’s teaching of tolerance and respect which prepares them for a positive and fulfilling role in society. Muslim schools are attractive to Muslim parents because they have better discipline and teaching Islamic values. Children like discipline, structure and boundaries. Bilingual Muslim children need Bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods, who understand their needs and demands.

None of the British Muslims convicted following the riots in Bradford and Oldham in 2001 or any of those linked to the London bombings had been to Islamic schools. An American Think Tank studied the educational back ground of 300 Jihadists; none of them were educated in Pakistani Madrasas. They were all Western educated by non-Muslim teachers. Bilingual Muslim children need bilingual Muslim teachers as role models. A Cambridge University study found that single-sex classes could make a big difference for boys. They perform better in single-sex classes. The research is promising because male students in the study saw noticeable gains in the grades. The study confirms the Islamic notion that academic achievement is better in single-sex classes.
Iftikhar Ahmad
http@//www.londonschoolofislami cs.org.uk
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 #2 Schools of TruthAnti-Nazi 2011-03-07 22:09
Madrassas are schools teaching the true & good religion of Islam.

Why do you assume Islam is anything but the divinely revealed truth?

We don't have to imagine, unlike those who get carried away with their imaginations, hint, hint.

The Quran itself instructs one to reflect & blind faith is not as beneficial in Islam. The very title of the Quran is Al-Furqan, which approximates to discernment or Critical Thinking.

"Islam is a far greater threat to the well-being of mankind than Fascism, Communism and the Hordes of Genghis Khan ever were."
On what rational basis do you make this contention?

http://www.iera.org.uk/
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 #1 Schools of IndoctrinationStuart Parsons 2011-03-04 20:44
Madrassas are schools of indoctrination for the false evil religion of Islam. Just try to imagine what would happen to any pupil in a madrassa who questioned the teaching of the Quran or the prophethood of Muhammad.

Islam is a far greater threat to the well-being of mankind than Fascism, Communism and the Hordes of Genghis Khan ever were.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
If you are experiencing problems please contact info@iengage.org.uk

Engage Publications



Books of Interest