Sunday, April 20 2014

Jack Straw on veil: “I’m glad that I raised the issue”


The Daily Mail has been running a series of extracts from the political memoirs of MP for Blackburn and Darwen and former Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw. In the final extract ahead of the book’s release tomorrow, Straw recounts his decision to publicly raise the issue of face veiling in 2006, when he described it as a mark of ‘separation and difference’, and the controversy that ensued.

Commenting on his appointment as Leader of the House of Commons in 2006, he writes:

“With more time on my hands in this new job, I reflected on some of the trickier issues I knew to be on people’s minds but which no one seemed to want to talk about. I decided to address the issue of the veil.

“I talked in private to my many Muslim friends about this, and in particular about the increasing use of the full veil by some women in town. It was only a small minority of women, I conceded, but enough for people to notice, and to worry about.

“I told them that I found it difficult properly to relate to people whose faces I could not see. Nor could I quite understand why this practice was increasing, since I could find no clear instruction in the Koran for it.

“I raised the subject in a column I have in a local newspaper.

“The veil, I argued, was hindering better relations between the communities because it was such a visible statement of separation and difference.


In his article which he published in the Lancashire Telegraph in 2006, as well as expressing an opinion about the potentially divisive nature of face veiling, Straw argued his case for asking women to remove their veils in his surgery.

He continues,

“My article provoked a massive reaction.

“It was clear that here was a subject people had been desperate to discuss openly. It was as though I’d unblocked a dam.

“My modest article generated great debate in Muslim countries. The Al-Azhar mosque in Cairo came out in my support, asserting that the full veil (the niqab) had never been obligatory.

“In this country, I spoke to a national group of Islamic scholars and established that the injunction to wear the veil was a much later interpretation of the message of the Koran by scholars of particular schools of thought, and had not come from the Prophet Muhammad.

“But when next I returned to Blackburn for my usual round of engagements, I got it in the neck. There were demonstrations by veiled women outside the advice centres, and delegations of veiled women inside.


“I spent days in meetings, in Blackburn and elsewhere, talking about what I had written in my original article. And what I had not written.

“The headline in the local paper had been Take Off Your Veils: but I had never proposed banning the veil, nor did I believe that it should be.

“Gradually the row died down, and many Asian women (and some Asian men) even thanked me for raising an issue which had previously been taboo.

“Some Asian women still wear the veil in Blackburn, including some who come to see me for advice. Some remove their veil; some don’t. But I’m glad that I raised the issue.

“What is the point of being in politics and not saying what you think about the difficult issues, as well as the easy ones?”

Following Straw’s comments in 2006, the face veil has become an increasingly salient topic in Europe with France banning face veiling in public and British far-right parties (UKIP and the BNP) and some Tories coming out in support of ‘burqa bans’ in Britain.

At an election hustings organised by ENGAGE during the 2010 general election, Straw apologised for his earlier comments on the veil stating that, in hindsight, “if I had realised the scale of publicity that they received in October 2006, I wouldn’t have made them and I am sorry that it has caused problems and I offer that apology.” He added that he regretted his comments had been “taken round the world and taken out of context”.

Though Straw says in his memoirs that he is glad he raised the issue, his admission on the impact his comments has been acknowledged by others. For example, in 2009 prior to a much publicised edition of Newsnight in which the leader of the BNP, Nick Griffin, was invited to appear, Guardian columnist Gary Younge argued that Griffin’s participation, and the BBC’s invitation, was the outcome of the ‘logical, lamentable path’ trodden by politicians since Straw ‘started a debate’ by asking Muslim women to remove their veils when attending his constituency surgeries.

The issue of face veiling has, since Straw’s comments mutated into something much bigger, visible not only in efforts to ban the practice in Europe, but also in the way in which veiled Muslim women have increasingly become the target of hostility and Islamophobia as the public discourse in the UK and Europe gravitates towards misrepresenting their personal choices and freedoms.









Comments  

 
0 #1 HijabIftikhar Ahmad 2012-09-28 22:00
According to a Japanese revert, "the hijab reminds people who see it that God exists, and it serves as a constant reminder to me that I should conduct myself as a Muslim. Just as police officers are more professionally aware while in uniform, so I had a stronger sense of being a Muslim wearing my hijab". 'Revert' not 'convert' coz every human were born into islam but the environment changes one faith. Wearing the hijab soon became spontaneous, albeit purely voluntary. No human being could force me to wear it; if they had, perhaps I would have rebelled and rejected it. However, the first Islamic book I read used very moderate language in this respect, saying that “Allah recommends it (the hijab) strongly” and since Islam (as the word itself indicates) means we are to obey Allah’s will I accomplished my Islamic duties willingly and without difficulty, Alhamdulilah.

The hijab reminds people who see it that God exists, and it serves as a constant reminder to me that I should conduct myself as a Muslim. Just as police officers are more professionally aware while in uniform, so I had a stronger sense of being a Muslim wearing my hijab. My hijab made me happy; it was both a sign of my obedience to Allah and a manifestation of my faith. I did not need to utter beliefs, the hijab stated them clearly for all to see, especially fellow Muslims, and thus it helped to strengthen the bonds of sisterhood in Islam.

Muslims are accused of being over-sensitive about the human body but the degree of sexual harassment which occurs these days justifies modest dress. Just as a short skirt can send the signal that the wearer is available to men, so the hijab signals, loud and clear: I am forbidden for you.

Practising Muslims, whether those born in Muslim families or those reverted to Islam, choose Islam rather than the illusory freedom of secular life. If it oppresses women, why are so many well-educated young women in Europe, America, Japan, Australia, indeed all over the world, abandoning liberty and independence and embracing Islam?

A person blinded by prejudice may not see it, but a woman in hijab is as brightly beautiful as an angel, full of self-confidence, serenity, and dignity.
IA
http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk
Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

Engage does not accept any responsibility for the statements, comments or opinions of individuals posted in the comments section of our website. All opinions expressed therein are the sole responsibility of the individual writers. While the comments page does not represent our views, we reserve the right not to publish specific comments that may be submitted to us, as well as to edit those that may fall short of parameters acceptable to us.


Security code
Refresh

Engage Publications



Books of Interest